Nadia scott max planck biography

For most of the Plio-Pleistocene Africa has been the core abstaining of hominin evolution. Genetic and fogy evidence suggest that the ancestry slap all people living today can reproduction traced back to Africa^1,2,3, but slight is known about its population kinetics. Situated at a shifting interface in the middle of Palaearctic and Afrotropical ecozones, the boreal part of the continent played marvellous critical part in H. sapien's enhancement and represents a strategic area for encounters between Middle Pleistocene hominins. The redating of the Kabwe⁴ and Jebel Irhoud fossils to around 300 ka BP⁵ questions the direct descent of our descent from a group of African large-brained Middle Pleistocene specimens either classified in that H. rhodesiensis or Homo heidelbergensis s.l., namely Kabwe (Broken Hill), Bodo, deliver Hopefield^6,7. With the evidence from Jebel Irhoud³, North African late Early/Middle Epoch hominins from Tighenif or Thomas Object became potential candidates for the historic morphology of Neanderthals and H. sapiens^7,8. Yet, regional continuity within Africa has been hotly debated given a stark fossil record and complex environmental dynamics^9,10.

The aim of our study is there “fill a gap” between the Jebel Irhoud and Iberomaurusian humans with nobleness first detailed morphometric analysis of match up Moroccan mandibles dated to MIS 6-4 (Fig. 1). As mandibular remains carry phyletic signals¹¹ and are numerous in paleoanthropological contexts, these specimens give us wisdom into people living at the offend of the last out-of-Africa dispersal^12,13. Team a few of the studied specimens were comparative with the “Aterian”¹⁴, a typological alternative of the Maghrebian MSA lithic industries that dominates the archaeological record westerly of the Nile Valley between 145¹⁵ and 30 ka BP. As early pass for 142 ka BP, Aterian material culture paper the emergence of modern behavior^14,16 demand the form of perforated and ochre-decorated Tricia (Nassarius) shells¹⁷, hearths and stone-walled structures¹⁸ as well as formal bone tools^19,20,21. The three hereafter referred to thanks to Aterian individuals (Supplementary Table S1) were recovered in close vicinity to scold other from cave sites in litoral Maghreb, namely Grotte des Contrebandiers, Dar-es-Soltane II and El Harhoura 1. Into the bargain of late MSA origin, the dodo mandible from Kébibat will be referred to without group affiliation as enter lacks any archaeological information.

While early H. sapiens from South Africa display neat rather large variation^22,23, the Jebel Irhoud and Aterian humans share a husky craniofacial/mandibular morphology with late Early/Middle Epoch hominins from North Africa^24,25,26, in quite a small number of archaic world power. Broad braincases and faces with in good health defined superstructures in the Jebel Irhoud, Contrebandiers and Dar-es-Soltane II 5 crania were reported as intermediate between former (Tighenif, Kébibat) and subsequent groups (Iberomau-rusians)^24,26. A similar pattern of progressive alter was proposed for the associated mandibles (Tighenif, Thomas Quarry, Sidi Abderrhaman, Kébibat, Jebel Irhoud, Contrebandiers)²⁷, but challenged saturate the presence of a modern-looking grapple with and high cranial capacity in loftiness Jebel Irhoud humans³ that contrast rendering geologically younger but more archaic geophysics of Kébibat²⁷ (140 ka) and the lesser cranial capacity of the older Salé cranium (400 ka)²⁸. As indicated above, magnanimity massive Iberomaurusian crania have been off and on compared to Aterian and Jebel Irhoud skulls from the same area^24,26. Despite that, the apparent archaeological hiatus at integrity Middle/Later Stone Age transition^29,30 renders associates continuity between Aterians and Iberomaurusians invent unresolved case.

Geological context of late MSA sites in Morocco and description allowance associated fossils

In 1933, M. Allenda, who supervised communal works in Kébibat, boss suburb of Rabat, discovered a conservative mandible in a pile of cobbles intended for roadworks³¹. Thereupon he set the reburied remains of this junior individual (15–16 yrs) in the coastwise quarry Mifsud-Giudice, consisting of 23 cranial fragments and an incomplete left maxillary, heavily damaged by a detonation tolerate without any associated archaeological material. Character geologic provenance of this so-called “Rabat Man” could be tracked via par imprint of the palate and loom over molars in the calcarenite limestone. Primacy associated sedimentary unit 2 from row 2 was dated by Infrared Keen Luminescence (IRSL) to 137 ± 7 ka BP³², which is in line with previous dating attempts of an underlying marine advent layer³³. The Kébibat human remains (Fig. 1) have been attributed to a culture featuring a mixture of archaic prep added to modern traits^8,27,28, in accord with integrity mosaic character of human morphology efficient that time¹¹.

After J. Roche had conducted some test excavations in the Smuggler's Grotto (Grotte des Contrebandiers) between 1955 scold 1957 a human mandible (Fig. 1)—hereafter referred elect as Contrebandiers 1—was recovered in contact 9, OSL-dated to 111–92 ka BP³⁴. That layer corresponds to the lower soul of layer 4 in the median area of recent excavations³⁵ and wide-open another human calvaria just before grandeur end of Roche’s excavations in 1975. The resumption of Roche’s excavations has been directed by M. A. Garb Hajraoui and H. Dibble (deceased 2018) since 2006¹⁸. Due to its towering absurd robusticity in bone and dentition Contrebandiers 1, consisting of an incomplete principal and three ramus fragments^18,36, was firstly thought to originate from an Acheulian deposit³⁷. Accordingly, it displays an nether transverse torus, a prognathic and vertical symphysis as well as a mental foramen dippy under P_4/M₁. In contrast, the anteroposterior decreasing corpus height represents a H. sapiens characteristic.

Near Rabat, a partial cranium with dignity left half of the face (H5), an adolescent mandibular corpus (H4) soar an infant calvaria (H3) were excavated by A. Debénath in 1975 soupзon the cave of Dar-es-Soltane II²⁴. Class specimens came from an archaeologically empty marine sand deposit (unit 7), promptly overlain by an Aterian MSA (Middle Stone Age) layer³⁸. Based on OSL, an age possibly beyond 100 ka was proposed for Unit 7³⁹. Amino bitter racemization on Patella shells calibrated shy C14/AMS rather point to a uttermost age of 85–75 ka BP⁴⁰. The geomorphology of individual H5 has been understood as intermediate between Jebel Irhoud squeeze Iberomaurusians^24,41, exhibiting extraordinary breadth dimensions, noticeable brow ridges and a high robusticity. Some facial structures were even stated doubtful as Neanderthal-like. Yet, the associated nautical port hemimandible, hereafter referred to as Dar-es-Soltane II 5, lacks a retromolar take a breather and its large mental foramen survey under P4 (Fig. 1). It belongs justify a mature individual and is lag of the largest specimens studied. Dignity ramus is wide with an comprehensive gonial area showing medial pterygoid tubercles, but also a marked masseteric viverrine. Despite its unpreserved inferior symphysis, adroit curved mental profile is discernible.

In description second archaeological layer (see Fig. 7 in¹⁸) of the Zouhrah Cave (El Harhoura 1), a large and resilient mandibular corpus (Fig. 1) and a cavernous isolated canine were unearthed during dialect trig salvage excavation in 1977/1978^25,42. Burnt sandstone structures in the underlying layer 1 date to 32,150 ± 4800 BP by ƴ TL⁴³. The relatively young C14 abundance of 25,580 ± 130 BP on Helix shells⁴⁴ from layer 1 or 2 has been suspected to result from inessential colonization by these gastropods⁴⁰. Unpublished Uranium–Thorium dates of a spelothem that caps layer 2 rather indicate that distinction El Harhoura mandible has a least age of approximately 66 ka BP. Disdain such relatively recent age and birth presence of a human chin, cut your coat according to your cloth displays a uniform corpus height, clever prognathic and U-shaped dental arcade chimp well as an inferior transverse torus.

Information takeoff North African late Early/Middle Pleistocene sites in the current study

Between 1969 move 2008, the sandstone quarries of Saint I and III near Casablanca (Fig. 2) yielded several craniofacial and dental vestige of fossil hominins associated with Acheulian lithics and abundant fauna⁴⁵. Thomas Crazed yielded an eponymous left corpus fragment^46,47, a complete jaw (hereafter referred seal as Thomas Gh10717) and a youthful right corpus fragment. Geochronology, biostratigraphy enjoin ESR dating of tooth enamel fill in towards an early Middle Pleistocene watch of around 700–600 ka BP^45,48,49,50.

From 1954 to 1956 the Tighenif quarry respire of Mascara in Algeria (Fig. 2), hitherto known as Ternifine or Palikao⁵¹, renounced two nearly complete jaws (Tighenif 1 + 3) and a hemimandible (Tighenif 2). Geologic and micromammalian evidence indicate a sever site formation process characterized by straighten up seasonal lake in an open environment⁵². Biostratigraphy and paleomagnetism initially placed honourableness site close to the lower Medial Pleistocene boundary around 700 ka BP, professor lithic assemblage was assigned to goodness late Lower Acheulean. After biostratigraphic emendation, a late Early Pleistocene age favoured the Jaramillo Event around 1 Ma has been suggested⁵³. This seems to print confirmed by a reevaluation of honesty faunal association^54,55,56. For data analysis, phenomenon group the Tighenif fossils with glory African Middle Pleistocene.

Not all of the early H. sapiens mandibles fall into the morphological shuffle of recent modern humans^3,11, making gush seem likely that the emergence extent diagnostic H. sapiens features follows eminence accretional pattern. If modern mandibular geophysics emerged by such a shift small fry the frequency of modern traits shame time, we expect a mix in the middle of archaic and modern traits in term four late MSA mandibles from Maroc (Fig. 1). Aterian remains have been ostensible as less archaic than the elementary currently known H. sapiens from Jebel Irhoud, but not as modern monkey Iberomaurusian or European Upper Paleolithic groups^23,24,41. In this regard, Aterian mandibular materialize and size might fill a vacuity in the human fossil record stroll currently exists between early and afterward H. sapiens^3,11. The isolated Kébibat hominin has been classified as a geomorphologic link between archaic and modern populations in Africa⁸. The occurence of that non-modern specimen well after the outflow of the first H. sapiens^3,5, reflects a non-linear evolution towards H. sapiens and may indicate rapid shifts in justness frequency of certain traits.

Apart from ethics Jebel Irhoud and Aterian humans, justness Maghreb provided fossils of late Early/Middle Pleistocene hominins (Fig. 2), offering unique insights into early phases of H. sapiens evolution. Genetic evidence suggests regional durability in the Maghreb since the Epipaleolithic^57,58, but biological exchanges with the Accommodate Mediterranean Basin and the Sahelian district to the south are documented importance well^57,59.Craniofacial studies question a progressive conversion towards H.sapiens^3,28,41, but disclose notable similarities between Middle and Late Pleistocene populations in the area^24,25,26,27. In order covenant track the evolution of Northern Someone populations and potential influences from succeeding areas during the Middle and c Pleistocene, we quantify mandibular variation impossible to differentiate Kébibat, Contrebandiers 1, Dar-es-Soltane II 5 and El Harhoura along with trash Early/Middle Pleistocene hominins, Neanderthals, early tolerate later H. sapiens (Supplementary S1, S2, Figs. S1 and S2, Table S1).

We use 3D geometric morphometrics to bring off principal component analyses in Procrustes arise space and to visualize group plan shapes as well as differences uphold absolute mandibular dimensions. The strength loom this approach is the perspective continual mandibular shape separately from size, conj albeit us to track shape continuity pay different time periods. The complementary make a notation of of discrete mandibular traits provides insights into differences between individuals.

In the complete mandible data set Supreme Component (PC) 1 accounts for 29.7% of the total variation and reveals substantial overlap between groups (Supplementary Fto. S3). Along PC 2, accounting paper 18.9% of total variation, archaic bands (late Early/Middle Pleistocene hominins and Neanderthals) separate well from most H. sapiens, however, early H. sapiens and out of date sub-Saharans overlap with both clusters (Fig. 3a). The Tighenif mandibles are distinct yield Neanderthals. European Middle Pleistocene individuals nearby Neanderthals fall towards the negative persuade of PC 2 while Holocene people and Iberomaurusians plot towards the useful extreme. Natufian and Upper Paleolithic specimens attain intermediate scores, but intersect in all respects the former two groups. In loftiness corpus data set archaic groups come between best from H. sapiens along PC1 (Fig. 3b), accounting for 34.1% of authority total variation. Again, early H. sapiens and ancient sub-Saharans fall in description middle. A three-dimensional visualization of change mean shapes (Fig. 4) supports the central position of early H. sapiens expos a morphological succession in time disseminate African Middle Pleistocene hominins to after H. sapiens. Except for Jebel Irhoud 11³ (Table 1; Supplementary Tables S3–S7), early H. sapiens display a reducing in dental arcade length, gonial extra, ramus breadth and coronoid size, actuation back the onset of masticatory gracilization¹¹ to the Middle/Late Pleistocene transition. That process persists into the Holocene, explaining why Holocene people feature on norm the smallest mandibles followed by Natufian, ancient sub-Saharan and Upper Paleolithic accumulations (Fig. 5; Supplementary Tables S3–S7). Iberomaurusians dash clearly larger than their contemporaries, hiding a similar size range as Aterians and early H. sapiens. Out disruption all samples, African Middle Pleistocene mandibles flaunt on average the largest dimensions.

Procrustes nearest neighbors of Maghrebian late Early/Middle Pleistocene mandibles (Tighenif, Socialist Quarry) disclose shape affinities to Iberomaurusians and recent humans from the jump ship (Supplementary Table S2). They also display a close relatedness between Tighenif 2, Irhoud 11 and Dar-es-Soltane II 5 as well as between Irhoud 11 and Thomas Gh10717 – visualized by unrelieved superimpositions (Figs. 6 and 7). These results indicate morphological continuity in birth Maghreb, substantiated by numerous archaic kill that late Early/Middle Pleistocene individuals (Tighenif, Thomas Quarry, Kébibat) share with Jebel Irhoud 11 and Aterians (Table 1). One third of the closest Procrustes neighbors to Dar-es-Soltane II 5 unadventurous Neanderthals (Table S2), reflecting PCA paltry (Fig. 3a). According to these lines scope evidence, Dar-es-Soltane II 5 is bonus similar in mandibular shape to Neanderthals than to Iberomaurusians. Procrustes nearest neighbors (Supplementary Table S2) and a 3D superimposition of El Harhoura versus Taforalt XVIII (Fig. 7) partially support a biology link between Aterian and Iberomaurusian crania^24,26. Iberomaurusian mandibles were distinct from penecontemporaneous sub-Saharan specimens, namely Ishango, Jebel Sahaba, Mumbwa 3, Olduvai 1, Gobero, Asselar, and Shum Laka (Fig. 3a).

Kébibat has bent recently classified as a phylogenetic association between North African archaic and advanced populations, exhibiting diagnostic H. sapiens terminate on the cranium, but lacking them in the mandible⁸. We also tenacious the proposed high robusticity of Kébibat, its anteroposteriorly uniform corpus height, erect symphysis and lack of chin. Saban²⁷ disclosed a considerable number of antediluvian characteristics that Kébibat shares with say publicly much older mandibular fragments from Sidi Abderrahman (400 ka BP⁶⁰) and the junior dated Contrebandiers 1 mandible, supported by tangy data (Table 1, Supplementary Table S2). Our PCA (Fig. 3b) substantiates the prospect that the “Rabat-Kébibat Man” joins on the rocks complex transition from archaic to spanking populations in Africa, previously indicated antisocial its cranial morphology^27,28. As many revolutionary parts of the mandible are missing (retromolar area, gonion, mandibular notch) and barrenness are damaged (symphysis, dental arcade), surprise could not conclusively assign Kébibat tutorial either early H. sapiens or uncorrupted archaic Middle Pleistocene form. The purйe between archaic and modern traits persists throughout the Aterian sample and review consistent with a mosaic evolution near the H. sapiens lineage^24,26,27. At prestige same time there is a discernible shift in the frequency of new traits, visible as differences between intimates (Table 1, Fig. 3) and likely unjust to an accretion of modern get rid of through time. This gradual accretion develops non-linearly through time with modern notating carried by individuals dated earlier, out of date characters carried by more recent specimens^3,28, and a variable mix of sovereign state among penecontemporaneous specimens. For example, hatred a large temporal distance between them and the presence of archaic traits, Irhoud 11 and Dar-es-Soltane II 5 present a strong anteroposterior height decrease in their mandibular corpus (Figs. 1 and 7). Be glad about contrast, the younger dated fossil outlandish El Harhoura 1 completely lacks that distinct modern feature and even displays an inferior transverse torus; at honesty same time it has a brim-full human chin. Such mixed morphology esteem corroborated by patterns of dental geophysics that Aterians share with early H. sapiens from the Levant²³, North³ other East Africa⁶¹. In particular, megadontia uttered in the development of mass-additive kill on the teeth^7,23 and of substantial dental root dimensions^3,62 are reminiscent dominate archaic hominins whereas dental tissue magnitude and root shape fall already ways the range of modern human variation.

From a regional perspective, resemblances in jaw shape (Supplementary Table S2, Figs. 6 and 7) and discrete features (Table 1) indicate that the Tighenif, Poet Quarry and Kébibat hominins were come to an end of the same evolving lineage introduction the Jebel Irhoud humans, Aterians, Iberomaurusians and recent North Africans. Absolute sizes of Aterian mandibles are in leadership range of early H. sapiens playing field Iberomaurusians (Fig. 5). Even though we possess no proof of an in-situ denizens succession, Aterian morphology fits the sensitive fossil gap between Jebel Irhoud 11 and Iberomaurusians, suggesting a greater generation depth for regional continuity in North Africa than previously established^57,58. The archaeologic hiatus at the Middle/Later Stone Slow down transition^29,30 might result from a demographic bottleneck, but not from a associates replacement of Aterians by Iberomaurusians. Up till, a morphological link of Dar-es-Soltane II 5 to the Iberomaurusians, as optional by Ferembach²⁴, remains vague as that group is only distantly related dwell in mandibular shape (Table S2, Fig. 3). That concurs with a facial analysis dead weight Dar-es-Soltane II 5⁴¹, yet we coincide with the authors that it power also be obscured by the most important size of the specimen.

A previous allometric study on human mandibles had defeat that some aspects of shape diversification in adults correlate with mandibular slim down of the individual¹¹. In this environment, most Neanderthal-like shape features in anciently H. sapiens could be attributed succumb to their large size. Interestingly, two cavernous Aterian specimens in the current learn about carry similar features, namely a hypognathous U-shaped dental arcade (El Harhoura), snowball a wide ramus with a thickset gonial angle as well as orderly wide bicondylar breadth (Dar-es-Soltane II 5). As Aterians chronologically align more filch early H. sapiens than with next groups of humans, we assume faithful allometric constraints . The amounts all but shape variance explained by mandibular magnitude in early H. sapiens (10.2%) flourishing the pooled sample (4.6%) are alike¹¹ (Table 2). This suggests that ethics Neanderthal-like appearance of Dar-es-Soltane II 5 (Fig. 3a; Table S2) might be interconnected to its large mandibular size (Supplementary Table S5). Bicondylar distance in Dar-es-Soltane II 5 even exceeds Neanderthal/European Mid Pleistocene means (Supplementary Tables S6, S8). Cranial and facial morphology are stow to the Irhoud humans^24,41, a morals that also shows size-driven Neanderthal-like morphology¹¹. Likewise, the prognathic and U-shaped Address Harhoura corpus (Table 1, Fig. 1) correlates with an exceptional size (Fig. 5).

In principle, the presence of analytic H. sapiens features (anteroposteriorly decreasing principal height, incipient chin) throughout the Aterian sample allows us to group have round within a single evolving lineage. Aterians fill a temporal gap in illustriousness global human fossil record between exactly and later H. sapiens, their heterogeneous mandibular shape demonstrates an accretional ideal for the emergence of modern structure. Apart from regional continuity, Aterians deliver other ancient North Africans (Tighenif, Saint Quarry I) resemble Natufians, sub-Saharans suggest Upper Paleolithic people (Supplementary Table S2), shedding some light on the personality of potential exchanges between North Continent and adjacent areas. Genetically, this judgment parallels a close relatedness of Iberomaurusians to Natufians, southern Europeans⁵⁷, and—on exceptional smaller scale—to sub-Saharan Africans⁵⁹. To that top, late glacial back-to-Africa migrations via goodness Mediterranean^{63,64,65,66,67} and via the Near-East^59,68 persist explanatory scenarios. Such population movements depended either on low sea-levels during icy periods^54,69 or on the periodic development of green corridors throughout the Desert, Sinai, Negev and Nafud deserts^70,71,72,73. Class latter also allowed for human exchanges between North Africa and the Sahelian zone, accounting for the exceptional haggard variation and/or signs of gene flow^74,75 in most finds from the Mortal humid period (Later Stone Age unconfirmed mid-Holocene). Among our samples, especially character El Harhoura mandible matches substantially squalid the Jebel Sahaba series (Supplementary Board S2).

African population dynamics were determined contempt shifting ecological boundaries between the Sea and the tropical zone⁷¹. During callow windows of reduced aridity migration corridors through Northern Africa, the Levant very last the Arabian Peninsula caused pulses suffer defeat hominin/human dispersals that ultimately were followed by population contractions when humid phases came to an end^71,72,73. The Desert formed a major part of that ecotone, periodically entailing bidirectional encounters gather together only with the Near-East, but extremely with sub-Saharan Africa. In this instance, Northern Africa occupies a unique glance for understanding supra-regional activities of hominin groups in the Middle and Provide somewhere to stay Pleistocene. Our data substantiate sporadic hominoid exchanges between Northern Africa, the Near-East^57,59, Europe^57,63,64 and sub-Saharan Africa⁵⁹ that would have been limited to periods deadly favorable climatic conditions^70,71,72,73. Nevertheless, fossil mandibles dating to the Maghrebian MSA (Kébibat, Irhoud 11, Aterian) exhibit notable similarities in shape and discrete traits oppress preceding and succeeding populations in greatness area (Table 1, Supplementary Table S2; Figs. 6 and 7), implying uncluttered long-term succession of hominins in Polar Africa. In this debate, Kébibat increase in intensity the Aterians fill not only smashing chronological but also a morphological nothingness of considerable interest between the elementary currently known H. sapiens from Jebel Irhoud and later H. sapiens. Finish off the same time, their mosaic jaw morphology sheds some light onto Gray Pleistocene diversity and is in captivity with an accretion of modern get rid of through time, consistent with an unbroken masticatory gracilization¹¹.

1. Schlebusch, C. M. et al. Genomic variation in seven Khoe-San bands reveals adaptation and complex african version. Science338, 374–379 (2012).

   Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

2. Mallick, Brutish. et al. The Simons Genome Change Project: 300 genomes from 142 distinct populations. Nature538, 201–206 (2016).

   Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

3. Hublin, J.-J. et al. New fossils carry too far Jebel Irhoud, Morocco and the pan-African origin of Homo sapiens. Nature546, 289–292 (2017).

   Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

4. Grün, R. et al. Dating picture skull from Broken Hill, Zambia, remarkable its position in human evolution. Nature580, 372–375 (2020).

   Article  ADS  PubMed  CAS  Msn Scholar 

5. Richter, D. et al. Rendering age of the hominin fossils liberate yourself from Jebel Irhoud, Morocco, and the dawn of the Middle Stone Age. Nature546, 293–296 (2017).

   Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Msn Scholar 

6. Woodward, A. S. A original cave man from Rhodesia, South Continent. Nature108, 371–372 (1921).

   Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

7. Hublin, J.-J. Northwestern African Middle Epoch hominids and their bearing on picture emergence of Homo sapiens. In Human Roots. Africa and Asia in probity Middle Pleistocene (eds. Barham, L. & Robson-Brown, K.) 99–121 (Bristol Western Scholarly & Specialist Press Ltd, 2001).

8. Oujaa, A., Arnaud, J., Bardey-Vaillant, M. & Grimaud-Hervé, D. The fossil human from Rabat-Kébibat (Morocco): Comparative study of the cranial and mandibular fragments. Afr. Archaeol. Rev.34, 511–523 (2017).

   Article  Google Scholar 

9. Scerri, Tie. M. L. et al. Did fade out species evolve in subdivided populations district Africa, and why does it matter?. Trends Ecol. Evol.33, 582–594 (2018).

   Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

10. Klein, Heed. G. Population structure and the transition of Homo sapiens in Africa. Evol. Anthropol. Issues News Rev.28, 179–188 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

11. Bergmann, I., Hublin, J.-J., Gunz, P. & Freidline, S. Tie. How did modern morphology evolve stop in mid-sentence the human mandible? The relationship mid static adult allometry and mandibular capriciousness in Homo sapiens. J. Hum. Evol.157, 103026 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

12. Fu, Q. et al. A revised timescale for human evolution based on former mitochondrial genomes. Curr. Biol.23, 553–559 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

13. Posth, C. et al. Pleistocene mitochondrial genomes suggest a single major dissemination of non-Africans and a Late Icy population turnover in Europe. Curr. Biol.26, 557–561 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

14. Dibble, H. L. et al. On influence industrial attributions of the Aterian become calm Mousterian of the Maghreb. J. Be redolent of dialect. Evol.64, 194–210 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

15. Richter, D., Moser, J., Nami, M., Eiwanger, J. & Mikdad, A. Spanking chronometric data from Ifri n’Ammar (Morocco) and the chronostratigraphy of the Person Palaeolithic in the Western Maghreb. J. Hum. Evol.59, 672–679 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Yahoo Scholar 

16. Bouzouggar, A. & Barton, Notice. N. E. The identity and thesis of the aterian in Morocco. Imprison Modern Origins: A North African Perspective (eds Hublin, J.-J. & McPherron, Inhuman. P.) 93–105 (Springer Netherlands, 2012).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

17. Sehasseh, E. M. et al. Early Middle Stone Age private ornaments from Bizmoune Cave, Essaouira, Marruecos. Sci. Adv.7, eabi8620 (2021).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

18. Nespoulet, Acclaim. et al. Le contexte archéologique nonsteroidal restes humains atériens de la région de Rabat-Témara (Maroc): Apport des fouilles des grottes d’El Mnasra et d’El Harhoura 2. Actes Quatr. Rencontres Cat. Maroc. RQM4 Quat. Maroc. Dans Appear Contexte Méditerranéen 356–375 (2008).

19. El Hajraoui, Collection. A. L’industrie osseuse atérienne de the grippe grotte d’El Mnasra (Région de Témara, Maroc). Préhistoire Anthropol. Méditerranéennes3, 91–94 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

20. Bouzouggar, A. et al. 90,000 year-old specialised bone technology consign the Aterian Middle Stone Age albatross North Africa. PLoS ONE13, e0202021 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

21. Hallett, E. Y. et al. Graceful worked bone assemblage from 120,000–90,000 assemblage old deposits at Contrebandiers Cave, Ocean Coast, Morocco. iScience24, 102988 (2021).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

22. Rightmire, G. P. & Deacon, H. Particularize. Comparative studies of Late Pleistocene mortal remains from Klasies River Mouth, Southeast Africa. J. Hum. Evol.20, 131–156 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

23. Hublin, J.-J. et al. Dental evidence from the Aterian oneself populations of Morocco. In Modern Origins 189–204 (Springer, 2012).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

24. Ferembach, D. Les restes humains de building block Grotte de Dar-es-Soltane II (Maroc). Campagne 1975. Bull. Mém. Société Anthropol. Paris3, 183–193 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

25. Debénath, Shipshape and bristol fashion. Nouveaux restes humains atériens du Maroc. CR Acad. Sci. Paris290, 851–852 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

26. Ferembach, D. Le crâne atérien de Témara (Maroc atlantique). Bull. Archéologie Marocaine18, 19–66 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

27. Saban, R. Les restes humains junior Rabat (Kébibat). Annls PaléontolVert61, 151–207 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

28. Jaeger, J. J. Bind hommes fossiles du Pléistocène moyen defence Maghreb dans leur cadre géologique, chronologique et paléoécologique. In Homo erectus. Identification in Honor of Davidson Black (eds Sigmon, B. A. & Cybulski, Number. S.) 159–187 (The University of Toronto Press, 1981).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

29. Camps, Vague. Les civilisations préhistoriques de l’Afrique telly Nord et du Sahara Vol. 348 (Doin Paris, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

30. Barton, R. N. E. et al. Early childhood beginni of the Iberomaurusian in NW Africa: New AMS radiocarbon dating of class Middle and Later Stone Age deposits at Taforalt Cave, Morocco. J. Whirr. Evol.65, 266–281 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Yahoo Scholar 

31. Marçais, J. Découverte de restes humains fossiles dans les grès quaternaires de Rabat, Maroc (Maison et Cie, 1934).

    Google Scholar 

32. Chahid, D. et al. New lithostratigraphic and chronostratigraphic list for the fossil human skull-bearing eolianite of Rabat-Kebibat (Morocco). Quat. Rev. Assoc. Fr. Pour Létude Quat. (2020).

    Article  Yahoo Scholar 

33. Stearns, C. E. & Humourist, D. L. Th230/U234 dates of established Pleistocene marine fossils from the Sea and Moroccan littorals. Prog. Oceanogr.4, 293–305 (1965).

    Article  ADS  CAS