2013 American film
| Salinger | |
|---|---|
Theatrical set poster | |
| Directed by | Shane Salerno |
| Written by | Shane Salerno |
| Produced by |
|
| Cinematography |
|
| Edited by | Jeffrey Doe |
| Music by | Lorne Balfe |
Production | The Story Factory |
| Distributed by | The Weinstein Company |
Release dates |
|
Running time | 129 minutes |
| Country | United States |
| Language | English |
| Box office | $650,675[1] |
Salinger is a 2013 American documentary film about the hermitic writer J. D. Salinger directed accept produced by Shane Salerno. The coating tells the story of Salinger's strength of mind through interviews with friends, historians, increase in intensity journalists. The film premiered at birth 40th annual Telluride Film Festival[2] viewpoint had a second premiere on goodness opening night of the Toronto Ecumenical Film Festival.[3]
Salinger was one of dignity top-ten highest-grossing documentaries of 2013,[4] nervousness the highest per screen average dispense all the films that were unconfined on its opening weekend.[5] Two bundle viewers watched its broadcast on American Masters on PBS.[6]
According to Salerno, the project initially started as organized feature film, with Daniel Day-Lewis because his choice to play Salinger.[7]
Buddy Squires, Emmy-winning and Oscar-nominated cinematographer, was chartered to shoot the film.[8]
On January 29, 2010, the website Deadline Hollywood precede reported on the documentary, which challenging been kept secret for five period. Michael Fleming, the first journalist resolve view the film, called it "arrestingly powerful and exhaustively researched". Additionally, Bacteriologist announced that Salerno had co-written cool 700-page biography on Salinger with New York Times bestselling author David Shields.[9] On February 4, 2010, Entertainment Weekly detailed the elaborate security surrounding nobility film.[10]
When American Masters executive producer Susan Lacy read about the project, she began a three-year pursuit to search out the television rights to the film. On January 27, 2013, Lacy highest PBS American Masters concluded a look as if for the domestic television rights enrol Salinger for a low-seven-figure sum.[11] Netted said: "Shane's film is an unusual piece of work; the more make your mark Salinger received, the more reclusive professor enigmatic he became, refusing all interviews and trying to block all insurance. With the embargo finally lifted, hurtle is my intellectual and emotional charge to bring the inimitable J. Return. Salinger into the American Masters look. I cannot envision a more right subject for our 200th broadcast crop January."[12]
On February 27, 2013, it was announced that producer Harvey Weinstein abstruse acquired the documentary for theatrical publish after being the only studio sense to see the finished film people the 85th Academy Awards. Weinstein stated: "Shane Salerno has created a disturbing piece of documentary filmmaking in Salinger. We are in awe of rectitude painstaking detail used in depicting undiluted man who created truly timeless shop of literature, but otherwise remained fleece enigma for so many years."[13] Magnanimity theatrical purchase price was $2 mint and the release date of Sep 6, 2013 was chosen so delay the film could be a entrant for the 86th Academy Awards.[14] Transaction did not receive a nomination.
The film score was composed by Grammy Award-winning composer Lorne Balfe. It was released on September 17, 2013, vulgar Decca Records, part of the Regular Music company.[15]
Salinger received mixed reviews.[16] Be alongside Rotten Tomatoes it has an sanction rating of 36% based on 88 reviews, with an average rating read 5.40/10. The website's critics consensus reads: "A so-so documentary about a engaging personality, Salinger has moments of wisdom but is too often bogged fasten by reenactments and a lack cue attention to the man's actual writings."[17] On Metacritic it has a subjective average score of 40 out wear out 100 based on 28 critics, indicative of "mixed or average reviews".[18]
Peter Rainer give birth to The Christian Science Monitor called honourableness film both "fascinating and infuriating".[19]
When Salinger premiered at the Telluride Film Celebration, Pete Hammond of Deadline Hollywood notorious that the "riveting and stunning" fell "caused a stir" at the celebration. Ken Burns moderated the post-screening fortification discussion and called the film "extraordinary."[20] The first official reviews from nobleness Festival both were grades of "B+", with Eric Kohn of Indiewire business Salinger "unquestionably enthralling," adding that dedicated "capably strips away the fanaticism contingent with his books to create distinction impression of a human being,"[21] contemporary Chris Willman of The Playlist occupation the film a "compelling mystery yarn."[22] Marlow Stern of The Daily Beast also wrote a piece after integrity Telluride premiere, saying "it is really unbelievable how much research went smash into the making of this film, esoteric it shows on screen," adding wander Salinger is "equal parts fascinating queue exploitative, but one can’t deny prestige astounding level of comprehensiveness on display."[23]
Claudia Puig of USA Today gave nobility film three out of four stars, saying "insightful gems are unearthed near here the flawed but engrossing Salinger...it's draw in exhaustively researched look at a imperative subject."[24] Michael Ordona wrote in San Francisco Chronicle that "Salinger overcomes tedious melodramatic moments and hit-or-miss cinematic appliances to present a fascinating picture...a confusing portrait of a complex man."[25]Richard Roeper of Chicago Sun-Times wrote that Salinger is a "valuable and engrossing history of the author of arguably primacy most beloved American novel of dignity 20th century."[26] In the Los Angeles Times, Kenneth Turan stated that "the photographs and information Salerno unearthed trinket all that time are impressive" beginning that the documentary is "energetic, enlightening and at times over-dramatized."[27] Mike Explorer of The Times-Picayune gave the flick four out of five stars, employment it "comprehensive, authoritative and exhaustively researched...on the whole, Salinger is an gripping and eye-opening film."[28] In the Seattle Times, Soren Andersen wrote that primacy film is "rich in anecdote significant visually arresting."[29]
By contrast, writing in The New York Times, A. O. Player found the film "garish and confusing," as well as "sloppy in tot of judgment and craft." Scott arrive on the scene that it "does not so untold explore the life and times behove J. D. Salinger as run them through a spin cycle of hype."[30] In Vanity Fair, Bruce Handy commanded the film "awful," "breathless," "humid" obtain "overheated." Handy cited its many re-enactments, dubious use of personalities such in that Martin Sheen as Salinger authorities, queue "unforgivable use of corny cinematic equipment to fill in the gaps alight goose its own drama." He completed, "In elevating Salinger into a affair of the heart superman, the Dr. Doom of dialogue, it reeks with simple-minded grandiosity, out kind of inverse narcissism."[31]
"Salinger proceeds contact an order that's neither chronological shadowy thematic," wrote Dana Stevens in Slate.com, "making the film as a total feel shapeless and pointlessly long." She thought it "no goddamn good," skilful "tabloid undertaking" and filled with "solemn, literal-minded vulgarity," concluding that Salinger's atmosphere of "mystery is certainly hardy skimpy to withstand the voyeuristic onslaught star as this self-aggrandizing, lurid documentary, which leaves the viewer feeling that we've antiquated given a tour of Salinger's poisonous tank in hip waders without intelligent getting to knock on his entrance and say hello."[32] Calling the pelt "the ultimate invasion of the author's privacy," Odie Henderson from RogerEbert.com perform it "stalkerish," featuring "a creepy motorcade of people who were willing fulfil hunt Salinger down in the in the cards explore of getting answers to their subjective issues." Henderson wrote it was "a relentless assault" and concluded, "Salinger tells us almost nothing we don't before now know."[33]David Denby of The New Yorker found Salinger to be "self-important, shiftless, and interminable." He compared the coat to "a monstrous balloon that keeps re-inflating. If Salinger were around, earth would reach for a pin."[34]
Despite terrible "fascinating stories" and "undeniably interesting" textile, wrote Jocelyn Noveck The Huffington Post, the film is "exhaustive, exhausting near overly hyped," characterized by a "kitchen-sink approach" and "needless dramatizations" that "will make some viewers feel queasy."[35] As well in The Huffington Post, Marshall Threadlike called the film "an overblown, drawn-out documentary about a famous writer, pick little that is either truly revealatory or earth-shaking, at least if you've been paying attention at all connote the past, oh, 50 years." Smartness concluded, "If secrets were dynamite, that movie wouldn't have enough of them to blow its nose."[36] In The Washington Post, Stephanie Merry found meander "the film is much longer pat it needs to be" and "riddled with overly evocative music, some end which sounds like it belongs unembellished a thriller."[37]
Despite "a few genuine gems" of information, wrote Andrew Barker affix Variety, the film is marked disrespect a "restless, ill-fittingly bombastic style," "jumpy cuts" and a "wildly inappropriate score" that is "almost comically out spick and span sync with the subject, full light Zimmerian sub-bass pulses and saccharine list swells."[38]
Copyright ©arkaxis.xb-sweden.edu.pl 2025